Skip to main content

The Book of Mormon and Ancient Calendars

The Classic period Maya had a number of calendrical cycles, but they probably didn't obsess about them as cycles any more than we think of our own repeating cycles of days and months and years. Recent scholars have openly acknowledged that past Maya archaeologists were often more obsessed with time reckoning than the ancient Maya themselves were.

One of their primary cycles was the 260 day cycle that combined 13 numbers with 20 named days (like we cycle the numbers 1-30 with seven named days) that roughly approximates 9 months. Modern scholars have nicknamed it tzolk'in since we don't know the ancient name for this cycle. According to Mark Wright, this cycle may be attested to in Omni 1:21 when it states that Coriantumr dwelt with the people of Zarahemla for "nine moons", which is a fitting translation since there is no English equivalent. What they were saying was "Coriantumr dwelt with the people of Zarahemla for one cycle of the Sacred Round". It is the only time a moon count is used in the Book of Mormon.

The most important Maya cycle was the katun, or period of twenty years. They would celebrate half-katuns of 10 years and quarter katuns of five years, called "hotun". Rulers would typically erect monuments every five years to celebrate the "Period Ending", or even "prophesy" five years in advance that on such-and-such a date the hotun would end and a new cycle would begin. For Mark Wright, the hotun cycle is attested in Helaman 14:2 when Samuel the Lamanite prophecies that Christ would be born in five years with wonders in heaven given as a sign, which ushered in a new period of Nephite history; indeed, they even began to reckon time from the time the sign was given.

Many others have pointed out that the baktun, or 400 year cycle, is attested to several times in the Book of Mormon (Alma 45:10; Helaman 13:5,9; Mormon 8:6). Mark Wright thinks the baktun and the katun are both attested to in Moroni 10:1 when Moroni states that "more than four hundred and twenty years have passed away since the sign was given of the coming of Christ". What he finds most interesting in this verse is that Moroni specifically says he wants his brethren the Lamanites to know that it had been four hundred and twenty years, because that number would carry much more meaning to the Lamanites than it would to the Gentiles.

The Maya "Long Count" records the elapsed number of periods of 400 years + periods of 20 years + years + periods of 20 days + days since the "creation" day of 13 August 3114 BC (although it's unclear exactly what happened on that day; the accounts differ from site to site). Moroni is basically giving an abbreviated Long Count date of 1.1 (1 period of 400 years + 1 period of 20 years).

It should also be noted that Charles Anton, in describing the transcription of the characters which he received form Martin Harris, said "the whole ended in a rude delineation of a circle divided into various compartments, decked with various strange marks, and evidently copied after the Mexican Calender given by Humboldt, but copied in such a way as not to betray the source whence it was derived." Charles Anton may not have believed in the Book of Mormon but he, unwittingly, was the first to connect it with Mesoamerica. 

All but the last paragraph of the the above was redacted from something Mark Wright once wrote on the mormondialogue message board.


Popular posts from this blog

Book of Mormon Geography: An Important Note on John L. Sorenson's Paradigm

Anyone who has read An Ancient American Setting for The Book of Mormon, Mormon's Codex or Images of Ancient America: Visualizing Book of Mormon Life, or anything else by John L. Sorenson, will notice that he leans on the work of the New World Archaeological Foundation(NWAF). This is because he places the Nephite heartland in the central depression of Chiapas, with the River Sidon being the Grijalva River. 
For me, the convergances in cultural development and in the movements of people, between the Book of Mormon and this region of Mesoamerica, in time and space, stretching from Veracruz, Oaxaca, Chiapas to Highland Guatemala, are impressive. 
As I'v said before, Sorenson's paradigm owes much to the NWAF, a legitimate and respected archeological franchise. Speaking of the his experience with the NWAF, non-mormon archeologist, Michael Coe says:

When I was a graduate student writing my dissertation on very early cultures in the south coast of Guatemala, it was suggested to me…

The Mexican Book of Mormon

Disclaimer: The following post is not political in nature. It is a not a "brown power" or "la raza" manifesto; nor is it intended to be an endorsement or condemnation of illegal immigration into the US. This post is speculative in nature and does not represent the official position of any church. This post is also not an attempt to prove that Joseph Smith Jr was a true prophet of God. We can't prove the Book of Mormon true but we can prove it interesting. 

Who cares about the geography of the Book of Mormon? Does it have a salvific or applicable value? No, from an eternal perspective, Book of Mormon geography is completely irrelevant. The Book of Mormon exists to bring people to Christ, so that they might repent of their sins and follow Him into the waters of baptism. That's it. Nevertheless, some people really like the Book of Mormon and want to know more about it and the people who wrote it. That's where geography comes in.

Just as knowing about the R…

The Prophecy of Aminadi: What, When and Where.

Aminadi was a prophet of God. At around 82 BC, his descendant, Amulek, tells us that he was the son Giddonah, who was the son of Ishmael, who was a descendant of Aminadi, the same Aminadi who interpreted the writing on the temple wall, which was written by the finger of the Lord.

What Amulek and, by extension, Mormon do not tell us is what was written on the wall, nor when or where it was written. Presumably, this was insider information, something Amulek's audience was already aware of. 
The mere mention of Aminadi and his interpretation, without giving more information, shows that the incident was a sufficiently important historical event, whose details did not need rehearsing. However, the setting, time and message of the divine temple inscription might be recovered with the use of archeology. The following is something from the great Michael Coe:
Archeologist Marion Hatch and her Guatemalan colleagues have encountered evidence for the existance of a now-extinct lake around whic…